Application
Structured intake — role history, methodology, domain, and recent delivery context.
- Reviewed by
- Candidate
- Signal
- Completeness, coherence, and seniority of stated experience.
Project management is judgment under uncertainty. Our review reflects that. Candidates progress through a deliberate pipeline — first triaged, then tested for proficiency, then formally determined by committee.
Establishing baseline credibility. Most attrition happens here, by design.
Structured intake — role history, methodology, domain, and recent delivery context.
Hand reviewed against the candidate's resume, LinkedIn, and credentials.
The substantive review. Scored against a rubric built for PM work.
Written prompt and short verbal note — assessed for clarity, brevity, and executive register.
Judgment scenarios across stakeholder handling, risk, scope, and prioritization trade-offs.
A realistic delivery artefact — status note, recovery plan, or stakeholder brief — scored blind.
Live conversation with an active operator. Probes for depth, range, and decision quality.
Committee review. Written rationale. No single reviewer can approve.
Weighted scoring is reconciled in committee. Every decision is written and traceable.
Listed to hiring partners, with profile, scorecard summary, and reviewer notes on file.